<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Marketing Should Be Doing Something Good</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.socialmediaworx.com/2008/marketing-should-be-doing-something-good/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.socialmediaworx.com/2008/marketing-should-be-doing-something-good/</link>
	<description>Leveraging social media to make great ideas happen</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 07:04:42 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Josh Chambers</title>
		<link>http://www.socialmediaworx.com/2008/marketing-should-be-doing-something-good/comment-page-1/#comment-308</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Chambers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 12:37:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialmediaworx.com/?p=205#comment-308</guid>
		<description>To take an extreme example, what about terrorism and their powerful online marketing techniques. Oddly enough, there was an article in the post regarding that this morning: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/06/23/AR2008062302135.html?hpid=topnews

Or, another extreme example: I think of all the websites that alerted sex tourists to places they could find underage prostitution -- the marketing on those sites added value not only to the end as they contained directions &amp; info; but also had some additional pieces that &quot;added value&quot; in the process.   

I know, two extreme examples. But,  it seems possible to perform &quot;good marketing&quot; for &quot;bad&quot; products/services.

How about Nike? A company that has produced quite a few excellent marketing campaigns -- excellent branded utilities -- but have been implicated in employing slave labor. Walmart could also fit that ticket with it&#039;s &quot;Why Wal-Mart Works; and Why That Drives Some People C-R-A-Z-Y&quot; documentary, and it&#039;s Flog (although, a Flog isn&#039;t &quot;good&quot; marketing).

Just some thoughts...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To take an extreme example, what about terrorism and their powerful online marketing techniques. Oddly enough, there was an article in the post regarding that this morning: <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/06/23/AR2008062302135.html?hpid=topnews" rel="nofollow">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/06/23/AR2008062302135.html?hpid=topnews</a></p>
<p>Or, another extreme example: I think of all the websites that alerted sex tourists to places they could find underage prostitution &#8212; the marketing on those sites added value not only to the end as they contained directions &amp; info; but also had some additional pieces that &#8220;added value&#8221; in the process.   </p>
<p>I know, two extreme examples. But,  it seems possible to perform &#8220;good marketing&#8221; for &#8220;bad&#8221; products/services.</p>
<p>How about Nike? A company that has produced quite a few excellent marketing campaigns &#8212; excellent branded utilities &#8212; but have been implicated in employing slave labor. Walmart could also fit that ticket with it&#8217;s &#8220;Why Wal-Mart Works; and Why That Drives Some People C-R-A-Z-Y&#8221; documentary, and it&#8217;s Flog (although, a Flog isn&#8217;t &#8220;good&#8221; marketing).</p>
<p>Just some thoughts&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ryanmoede</title>
		<link>http://www.socialmediaworx.com/2008/marketing-should-be-doing-something-good/comment-page-1/#comment-306</link>
		<dc:creator>ryanmoede</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 15:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialmediaworx.com/?p=205#comment-306</guid>
		<description>It seems doubtful. Can you think of a marketing service that is more valuable than the product it&#039;s promoting?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems doubtful. Can you think of a marketing service that is more valuable than the product it&#8217;s promoting?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Chambers</title>
		<link>http://www.socialmediaworx.com/2008/marketing-should-be-doing-something-good/comment-page-1/#comment-303</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Chambers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 23:58:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialmediaworx.com/?p=205#comment-303</guid>
		<description>Ryan,

Makes sense. I wonder if it&#039;s possible to do something &quot;good&quot; -- as in valuable to a need of the customer -- for a &quot;bad&quot; product. Your post makes sense....it just still makes me think. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ryan,</p>
<p>Makes sense. I wonder if it&#8217;s possible to do something &#8220;good&#8221; &#8212; as in valuable to a need of the customer &#8212; for a &#8220;bad&#8221; product. Your post makes sense&#8230;.it just still makes me think. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ryanmoede</title>
		<link>http://www.socialmediaworx.com/2008/marketing-should-be-doing-something-good/comment-page-1/#comment-297</link>
		<dc:creator>ryanmoede</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 15:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialmediaworx.com/?p=205#comment-297</guid>
		<description>Josh - I use the term &quot;good&quot; in the sense that the marketing service is of some kind of value to the customer. While the good can most certainly be of the charitable or noble kind, in this sense it&#039;s that it meets a need (often in concert with the product itself) for the customer. I think Stefan&#039;s quote about customer&#039;s responding to those &quot;good&quot; services with sales has a lot of truth.

As always, thanks for your questions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Josh &#8211; I use the term &#8220;good&#8221; in the sense that the marketing service is of some kind of value to the customer. While the good can most certainly be of the charitable or noble kind, in this sense it&#8217;s that it meets a need (often in concert with the product itself) for the customer. I think Stefan&#8217;s quote about customer&#8217;s responding to those &#8220;good&#8221; services with sales has a lot of truth.</p>
<p>As always, thanks for your questions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Chambers</title>
		<link>http://www.socialmediaworx.com/2008/marketing-should-be-doing-something-good/comment-page-1/#comment-296</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Chambers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 04:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialmediaworx.com/?p=205#comment-296</guid>
		<description>Ryan, I dig what you&#039;re saying about creating marketing that makes life better through the marketing itself. 

Question: if your product isn&#039;t the most useful product out there, do you think it&#039;s possible to create useful marketing? Your headline struck me and made me wonder, &#039;what does it actually mean to do be doing something good through marketing?&#039; Does the cause have to be good (rescuing slaves, environmental conservation)? Or can the cause be selling sugar water that rots teeth?

Thanks for your thoughts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ryan, I dig what you&#8217;re saying about creating marketing that makes life better through the marketing itself. </p>
<p>Question: if your product isn&#8217;t the most useful product out there, do you think it&#8217;s possible to create useful marketing? Your headline struck me and made me wonder, &#8216;what does it actually mean to do be doing something good through marketing?&#8217; Does the cause have to be good (rescuing slaves, environmental conservation)? Or can the cause be selling sugar water that rots teeth?</p>
<p>Thanks for your thoughts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
